Just got back from a game. Turned out the other team didn’t have enough players show up so they had to forfeit and we donated a couple of our guys over to them. We ended up playing a 44 min scrimmage which ended up in a 2-2 tie.
Before I went to the game, I stayed around at work to watch the live webcast of John Kerry’s acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention. The first thing I noticed, is what a good speaker he is. You don’t hear him and watch him and think he’s slow like our current president. He just has the aura of a strong and forceful leader, even different from Bill Clinton, whose demeanor was something more neighborly. Regardless, both of these former lawyers gave what I thought were pretty good speeches. The transcript of Clinton’s speech is here:
Clinton’s Speech. Excerpts from Kerry’s speech are here: John Kerry’s Speech.
Actually, I just found the links to the videos. This is Kerry’s Speech and this is Clinton’s Speech
In general, Kerry seems to want to make himself out to be a champion for the middle class. He focuses in on the segment of American society that are working regular 40-60 hour weeks, and also on the segment that is struggling to get by, promising that the decisions of the Republican administration only benefiting the richest portion of American society, will be rectified.
There are a couple of things that I’m worried about. For one thing, John Kerry is clearly against out-sourcing. Even though it may be my job that is someday given to some Indian programmer making a quarter of what I do, I for one support outsourcing. In theory, outsourcing allows for corporations to improve their bottom line. This in turn means more money available for investment. Which part of, goes into R&D. Which creates new technology. Which creates new fields. Which creates a need for new types of skills… new workers… the advancement of American technology… with which the original laid off workers can be retrained. Either that or existing workers are re-trained and everyone just moves one step up the ladder. Which is exactly what IBM just announced they would be doing.
Let’s say we didn’t outsource jobs. These overseas positions would still be filled somehow. The programmers won’t just sit around and do nothing. Eventually, they will catch up and be competitors - it is inevitable. But at least by outsourcing, we will have built relationships with them, in a way, have some control over them since usually they are doing contractual work for a larger corporation. Hopefully by the time they get to the point where they can compete, the cost of living will have naturally inflated to a point where their salaries won’t be so cheap anymore, at which point the outsourcing issue just may go away.
It’s hard to accept that we have to trim fat to move forward when you’re the fat, but it’s just the way things are. The thing that has been missing so far, however, is an effective program for retraining these workers. I think Kerry makes some allusions that that’s what he intends to do, especially for manufacturing - that seems to be the outsourced segment that he really focuses on. But I am still a little worried that his stance against outsourcing is so strong. Hopefully it’s just to get the fiscally liberal vote.
I do have to admit I was wrong about one thing. I was originally thinking that the tax break to the rich was a good idea, because it is true that this will allow the rich to invest more… which in turn should help the innovation because supposedly these rich people are the ones that are entrepeneurs. But that’s just not really true. What Kerry intends to do, give tax breaks to small businesses, that makes a lot more sense… targeting much more directly the entrepeneurs and innovators.
Kerry didn’t touch on religion too much, but I thought his statement, “I don’t want to claim that God is on our side. As Abraham Lincoln told us, I want to pray humbly that we are on God’s side,” is a much more accurate portrayal of how the relationship should be, compared to the Bush administration, whose actions are just so unbelievably self-righteous that it hurts even the socially conservative like myself (although I think I’m probably more of a moderate).
In the end, I just think Bush needs to go. After 9/11, we had the goodwill of the entire world (save those that attacked us) and he wasted it and just created more division. Not only are we even more hated by the Islamic extremists, we have created enemies and damaged relationships within the U.N. Our allies are slowly deserting us. And that isn’t even considering the state that the nation was after that attack… and how we lost that unity and patriotism that I think pretty much everyone felt… I just remember that those days were amazing… the reaction of the nation after we were attacked. All but squandered at this point unfortunately. Clinton said it in his speech, “After 9/11, we all wanted to be one nation, strong in the fight against terror. The president had a great opportunity to bring us together under his slogan of compassionate conservatism and to unite the world in common cause against terror. Instead, he and his congressional allies made a very different choice: to use the moment of unity to push America too far to the right and to walk away from our allies, not only in attacking Iraq before the weapons inspectors finished their jobs, but in withdrawing American support for the Climate Change Treaty, the International Court for war criminals, the ABM treaty, and even the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.”
I just don’t trust Bush anymore. His ability to lead, to make good decisions, to be the figurehead of this nation. It’s not that he isn’t passionate about his decisions, but I just think he makes poor ones. I haven’t watched Farenheit 9/11 and probably won’t, but really. Haven’t we all seen enough?